Skip to content

Canada, Friend or Foe, Redux

February 12, 2013

Two years ago, my article, Canada, Friend or Foe, explained why environmentalists were campaigning to stop the development of Canada’s tar sands. Simply stated, it was because CO2 is emitted during the production of oil from tar sands.

Once again, we are on the verge of treating Canada as an enemy, and not as a friend.

The Keystone pipeline is key to bringing over 800,000 barrels of oil per day from Canada to the oil refineries along the U. S. Gulf of Mexico.

One headline in a Canadian paper said: “Oil Price Discount costing each Canadian $1,2001.” This is an accusation that shouldn’t be discounted. Canada and the U. S. have been excellent trading partners for a century and our policy about the Keystone pipeline could cause lasting damage.

A recent column in the National Post said: “The [inaugural] speech confirms that Mr. Obama’s re-election is bad news for Canada, first in terms of what Obama’s rigid statism and fiscal fecklessness may do to the U.S. economy, and then in terms of policies that specifically affect Canada, primarily on energy and climate.”

The State Department must approve the pipeline since it crosses an international border. The original scuffle was over the routing of the pipeline through Nebraska, but the Governor of Nebraska has recently approved the new routing for the pipeline that avoids sensitive areas. Now the State Department must act … which they say they will do in March, or shortly thereafter.

Environmental organizations are up in arms over the Keystone pipeline, and believe, with Obama’s re-election, they hold the upper hand. The Sierra Club has threatened civil disobedience to prevent the construction of the pipeline.

Another environmentalist complained that building the pipeline would allow exporting of oil from the Gulf, when in fact, it would allow refineries to produce products that would be exported. Jobs are created when refineries produce products for export.

Senator Kerry will be the new Secretary of State. He avoided answering questions during his confirmation about what he would do about the Keystone pipeline. Kerry has been a long time proponent of cutting CO2 emissions and tried to push green house gas (GHG) legislation through Congress three years ago.

We can only hope that Kerry will set aside his views on climate change and approve the Keystone pipeline. If he doesn’t, it will be a blow to Canada’s economy and could elicit reprisals. We need Canada as a friend, not as an enemy.

Note 1: National Post, January 25, 2013. The article said oil export constraints were the cause, and these restraints would be largely lifted with the construction of the Keystone pipeline.

*  *  *  *  *  *

If you find these articles on energy issues interesting and informative, you can have them delivered directly to your mailbox by going to theEmail Subscription heading below the photo.

Please forward this message to those who might be interested in these articles on energy issues.

*  *  *  *  *  *

[To find earlier articles, click on the name of the preceding month below the calendar to display a list of articles published in that month. Continue clicking on the name of the preceding month to display articles published in prior months.]

© Power For USA, 2010 – 2013. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author, Donn Dears, LLC, is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Power For USA with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

About these ads
3 Comments leave one →
  1. February 14, 2013 9:32 pm

    Next weekend, there’s a protest in Washington DC over the Keystone XL pipeline. We’ll always help out our northern neighbors, but not at the expense of out citizens. Tar sands is dirty, creates more spills, and eventually will make its way into our water supply.

  2. February 16, 2013 10:57 am

    Thanks for the comment. It’s been demonstrated that oil from Tar sands does not create more spills. The claim is a canard used by environmental extremists to oppose the use of Canada’s oil.
    There’s no reason to believe that oil from Tar sands will pollute water supplies any more than oil from the thousands of miles of pipelines that already exist in the United States.
    In spite of what you say, your actions, if successful, will hurt Canada.

Trackbacks

  1. Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup | Watts Up With That?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 263 other followers