Skip to content

Climate Models and the Real World

September 2, 2011

The anthropogenic global warming (AGW) threat is based on computer models. It’s the temperature projections of computer models that are being used to predict catastrophic global warming and climate change.

Should we conclude that the AGW threat is bogus if the models are wrong?

Given the importance of the issue, it would seem to be essential to determine whether actual temperatures follow those predicted by the models. If actual temperatures aren’t following the models, what would it take to confirm or disprove that the models were an accurate representation of future temperatures?

This is what Bryan Leyland (Fellow of the Institution of Professional Engineers, New Zealand, one of many citations) postulated as he compared actual temperatures with those from the models.

As he explains at the temperature disparity between what the models have predicted and the actual temperatures over the past several years is huge, and that it would require very large increases in temperatures between now and 2020, and even 2030, for actual temperatures to conform to the trends predicted by the models.

He shows that temperatures would have to increase by 0.7 degrees in 6 years or by 0.8 degrees in 9 years, for the trends between the models and actual temperatures to be equal. These equate to 12 or 9 degrees per century, which far exceeds anything that has happened over the last century.

While this doesn’t prove that the models are wrong, it does indicate that there is a very high probability that they are wrong.

Since the AGW threat is based on temperature trends predicted by models, it’s probably reasonable to assume that the AGW threat is bogus.

This should give pause to those who are demanding that we spend billions of dollars to cut CO2 emissions 80% in the U.S. by 2050 –  a task that probably is impossible anyway. (See Be Passionate About Global Warming)   

*  *  *  *  *  *

If you find these articles on energy issues interesting and informative, you can have them delivered directly to your mail box by going to the Email Subscription heading below the photo.

Please forward this message to those who might be interested in these articles on energy issues.

*  *  *  *  *  *

[To find earlier articles, click on the name of the preceding month below the calendar to display a list of articles published in that month. Continue clicking on the name of the preceding month to display articles published in prior months.]

© Power For USA, 2010 – 2011. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Power For USA with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

2 Comments leave one →
  1. September 2, 2011 9:20 pm

    You do understand that none of this matters! Global Climate change is more a religion then science. You do not have to prove it is happening, you just have to beleive it is happening!

    The theory is correct. If the facts do not fit, the facts are wrong.

    The theory is correct. If the data does not prove this, the data is wrong.

    The theory is correct, the theory is correct….. ahmmmmmmmm Men!

  2. September 3, 2011 9:29 am

    There’s a lot of truth in what you say.
    I have to deal with facts in my articles, so I approach the issue by using a factual based argument.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s