Skip to content

Geothermal Revisited

November 11, 2014

Enhanced Geothermal, referred to as hot rocks geothermal, or simply hot rocks, has been studied by MIT, but abandoned in Australia and Switzerland.

Periodically, an attempt is made to resurrect hot rocks for use in generating electricity.

The McClatchy Tribune recently reported on possible hot rocks development in California.

While traditional geothermal is a viable, but very limited energy source that only accounts for 0.4% of U.S. electricity supply, it may be helpful to review how geothermal works and why hot rocks is another pipe dream backed by extreme environmentalists.

Traditional geothermal uses three methods for generating electricity.

  • The direct steam method uses high temperature steam as it emerges from the earth to drive a turbine generator. These are the most cost-effective plants, but sites with steam are rare.
  • Most conventional geothermal systems draw high-temperature brine (above 400 °F) from the earth, and injects it into a low-pressure chamber where the super-heated water flashes into steam. The steam is used to drive a turbine generator.
  • For low temperature resources, binary cycle systems are used. Moderate temperature geothermal fluid is passed through a heat exchanger, where the heat is transferred to a fluid such as iso-butane which vaporizes. The vaporized fluid then drives a turbine generator.
Binary Cycle Geothermal Plant - From Geothermal Energy Association

Binary Cycle Geothermal Plant – From Geothermal Energy Association

As the McClatchy Tribune article noted, some existing traditional installations have trouble sustaining the system because the super-heated water supply is gradually depleted. Some geothermal operators have replaced the dwindling supply of water with treated water from sewage treatment plants.

Even though traditional geothermal plants can provide electricity at a reasonable cost, traditional geothermal cannot provide large amounts of electricity because there are too few suitable geothermal resources.

This is why hot rocks is proposed as an alternative.

Theoretically, hot rocks could produce huge amounts of electricity, and a 2006 MIT report gave impetus to the idea of using hot rocks for base load power generation. The MIT report concluded hot rocks was theoretically possible.

However, actual attempts to develop hot rocks have failed.

Groups, such as Greenpeace, have touted hot rocks as a revolutionary method for generating large amounts of electricity.

Unfortunately, the concept has turned into another pipe dream.

Hot rocks entails drilling two wells to depths reaching 10,000 feet or more, where there are high temperature rock formations. Fracturing techniques are used to open fractures in the rocks between the two wells. Water is injected down one well where it is converted to steam as it travels through the fractures in the hot rocks. The steam rises to the surface through the second well and is used to drive a turbine generator.

Geodynamics Limited in Australia has attempted to develop such installations since before 2003, and have drilled wells to depths of 14,500 feet. Subsequently, the wells have been abandoned, with various excuses given for the failure of the projects to produce electricity on a sustained basis.

An effort to develop hot rocks in Basel, Switzerland was stopped in 2006, when the project caused a magnitude 3.4 earthquake.

Efforts to develop hot rocks for producing electricity will continue. The Department of Energy (DOE) is funding research into hot rocks. DOE said, “The [$31 million] FORGE initiative is a first-of-its-kind effort to accelerate development of this innovative geothermal technology that could help power our low carbon future.”

Since the United States has ample supplies of natural gas and coal for generating electricity, there is no need to pursue hot rocks, where there is a history of failure, other than to satisfy those who believe fossil fuels cause global warming.

* * * * * *

These articles can be delivered directly to your mailbox. Subscribe by clicking below the photo on the right side of the article where it says email subscription, and entering your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time.

If you know someone who would be interested in these articles you can send him/her a link to the article and suggest he/she subscribes by clicking on the email subscription link under the picture on the right side of the page, and entering their email address.

To find earlier articles, click on the name of the preceding month below the calendar to display a list of articles published in that month. Continue clicking on the name of the preceding month to display articles published in prior months.

© Power For USA, 2010 – 2013. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author, Donn Dears, LLC, is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Power For USA with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Advertisements
2 Comments leave one →
  1. Catcracking permalink
    November 12, 2014 6:22 pm

    Donn,
    Thanks for the informative article.
    I just wish that we had competent people in the DOE to vet all the energy projects and base the awards on technical viability rather than the current system.
    Your comment “pipe dream” seems to apply to too many of the funded projects. Can someone explain what technological energy production gains we have derived from the Hundreds of billion dollars already spent?

    • November 12, 2014 8:33 pm

      I agree. Unfortunately I haven’t done the research necessary to definitely account for all the wasted money. There’s no question our government has spent billions with no tangible results. Solyndra, FutureGen, IGCC etc. plus dozens of other grants, subsidies and loan guarantees are all wasted money.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s