Skip to content

Have the Saudis Opened Pandora’s Box?

September 29, 2015

In February, 1945, the ruler of an impoverished country, King Abdul Aziz ibn Saud, met with the leader of the most powerful nation in the world, President Roosevelt.

The meeting took place aboard the cruiser USS Quincy in the Great Bitter Lake, a part of the Suez Canal.

During the meeting, the King mentioned that his legs had grown feeble with age, and the President said, “I have two of these chairs, which are also twins. Would you accept one as a personal gift from me?”

The king said, “Gratefully. I shall use it daily and always recall affectionately the giver, my great and good friend.”

Meeting between King Saud and President Roosevelt. Admiral Leahy to the left, Colonel Eddy, interpreter and head of US Legation, Jeddah SA, kneeling.

Meeting between King Saud and President Roosevelt. Admiral Leahy to the left, Colonel Eddy, interpreter and head of US Legation, Jeddah SA, kneeling.

The meeting established a personal relationship of trust and respect between two men, and a relationship between two countries that has lasted for nearly three quarters of a century.

The relationship survived despite both countries having polar opposite views on Israel.

It began to fray when it became known that some of the highjackers who committed the 9-11 attacks on the United States were from Saudi Arabia, and that a Saudi, Osama bin Laden, had instigated the attack.

In the complex relationships of the Mideast, where Sunnis are aligned against Shiites, and where a Sunni faction has established a Caliphate, and a conservative Wahhabi Sect has been aligned with the Saudi ruling family for centuries, and where Saudi Arabia’s oil rich Eastern Province is mostly Shia, it’s difficult to make sense of the various factions.

Over the past few years, the Saudis have been threatened at various times from four sides: From the East by Iran, from the West by a Morsi government in Egypt, from the South by insurgents in Yemen and from the North by ISIS.

Economically, the Saudi’s perceived an economic threat from the United States with its development of shale oil.

For reasons only the Saudis can understand, they decided to reverse their support of the price of oil, and instead undertook a strategy of maintaining market share which inevitably led to lower oil prices.

It was an attack on the economic interests of the United States, but also, possibly, a strategy to deny Iran the ability to fully benefit from its oil exports at higher prices. It was believed, correctly, that embargoes would be lifted when the nuclear deal with Iran was finalized and Iran would increase its oil exports.

Surely, the Saudis assumed other OPEC countries would conform to its strategy and not engage in price cutting. This could have been a rational assumption if the oil surplus had been quickly eliminated and if the shale oil industry in the United States had quickly collapsed.

Now a year has passed, and the situation appears entirely different.

Demand for oil has grown only tepidly.

While hurt, the shale oil industry in the United States has not collapsed. In fact, it has gotten better at producing oil. And, it has demonstrated it can quickly increase output when prices rise, placing a cap on the price of oil for the next few years until worldwide demand increases more robustly.

With oil still in surplus, other OPEC nations have begun undercutting the Saudis. A price war is emerging, and it’s likely to expand as Iran increases its output of oil.

The Saudis believed they could stabilize the market and quickly eliminate the over supply of oil by allowing the price of oil to fall, thereby putting shale oil and other marginal producers out of business.

But it hasn’t happened that way.

Saudi Arabia now faces the possibility of deteriorating prices, with OPEC nations undercutting each other. Meanwhile the shale oil industry lurks in the background, ready to pounce when prices rise.

The Saudis may have committed the worst business blunder in recent years, and opened Pandora’s box of oversupply and low prices.

Meanwhile the United States will benefit long term with a shale oil industry that continues to improve its ability to produce oil.

Unless OPEC can reduce oil output to align supply with current demand, it’s doubtful the price of oil will go much above $55 per barrel until worldwide demand increases and the oversupply of oil is reduced. While some areas in the U.S. will support new drilling at prices below $55, new shale oil development becomes profitable in an increasingly large number of areas above that price.

Saudi Arabia has been pumping at around 10.5 million barrels per day during the summer to accommodate its air-conditioning load, and should cut back by around 0.3 to 0.5 million barrels per day this fall.

A significantly larger cutback could indicate a change in strategy.

. . .


The Kingdom, Arabia and the House of Saud is the source of historical information. Pages 268 – 275 relate specifically to the meeting between ibn Saud and President Roosevelt.

A History of Saudi Arabia, The Kingdom, by Robert Lacey.

A History of Saudi Arabia, The Kingdom, by Robert Lacey.


* * * * * *


It’s easy to subscribe to articles by Donn Dears.

Go to the photo on the right side of the article where it says email subscription. Click and enter your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time.

If you know people who would be interested in these articles please send them a link to the article and suggest they also subscribe.

© Power For USA, 2010 – 2015. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author, Donn Dears LLC, is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Power For USA with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

7 Comments leave one →
  1. September 29, 2015 10:00 am

    As usual, a very insightful message. A long time ago, in 1972 before the first Arab Oil Embargo, I was starting up an oil fueled power plant in NC. (LV Sutton), later converted to coal and now shut down. During that startup the Plant Manager mentioned “it is funny how energy costs work, as oil goes up, so does natural gas and coal” For most of the years since then, that held true. Then came Shale Oil and Gas…..a new business model. As you know, I am a coal power engineer but I have great respect for all forms of energy. Maybe no longer as strongly linked in pricing as they once were, but still Fossil Fuels remain important and provide over 80% of America and the world’s energy to lift people from poverty and power the good lives of those of us in the Developed World. It saddens me to see such uninformed elected officials making policies that harm the greater good. Not only the U.S.A. but for the Developing Countries as well. Such as, the Pope’s misguided advisors.
    Thank you for your good work and insight,
    Dick Storm

  2. Max Casa permalink
    September 29, 2015 11:59 am

    Morsi is not the ruller in Egypt anymore. ISIS is made in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the West. So, these are not really threats against KSA from west and north sides of the country. It seems this article was written in the not too distant past, at the same time, you have rightly pointed out something that they refer to the present time. What is the reason for this confusion?
    As a whole, your remarks are correct. Thanks.

    • September 29, 2015 2:57 pm

      I tried to make it clear that the Morsi, Egyptian threat was earlier when I said, “over the past few years.” That threat no longer exists. ISIS wasn’t formed by Saudi Arabia. It is an outgrowth of Sunni moslems, but that doesn’t mean they were established by Saudi Arabia. No one knows the extent to which Wahhabi conservatives may have provided help to ISIS, but ISIS is not in the best interests of the monarchy, so It is a threat.
      There should be no confusion, and I hope this helps clarify my article.
      Many thanks for your comments.

  3. Max Casa permalink
    September 29, 2015 5:17 pm

    Thanks for your reply.
    Back to your comment:
    As a result, Egypt today is not a threat against Saudi Arabia.
    This confirms my point.
    About ISIS and its very well equipped army, you know that it is very unlikely an army to this scale could be formed within a short time. It is about the coalition against Assad. Out of this alliance, there is ISIS with funding from Qatar, KSA, Jordan, UAE and logistic support of Turkey.This is undeniable.
    Of course, I agree with you that this was not the main part of your paper, and maybe not so necessary to deepening political issues, please see my content as a marginal issue. Just a reminder.

    • September 29, 2015 5:23 pm

      There are lots of things that go on behind the curtains about which we are not aware. Whether they are as you say, I don’t know. I spent a lot of time in the area and have greater understanding about it than do many people … But I’m not privy to private dealings that may have taken place.
      Thanks for you comments.


  1. Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup #199 | Watts Up With That?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s