Skip to content

Hot Rocks and Fracking

October 20, 2015

Electricity has been produced successfully from geothermal sources for decades.

Perhaps, the first successful geothermal power plant was in Larderello, Italy in 1911.

Today, in the United States, there are successful geothermal power plants in California and Nevada.

The potential for traditional geothermal power plants is limited by the scarcity of areas in the United States where geothermal energy is available, and by the diminishing supply of water as the geothermal resources age. In California, waste water has been used to augment the natural supply of water.

Traditional geothermal uses three methods for generating electricity:

  • The direct steam method uses high-temperature steam as it emerges from the earth to drive a turbine generator. These are the most cost-effective plants, but sites with steam are rare.
  • Most conventional geothermal systems draw high-temperature brine (above 400 °F) from the earth, and injects it into a low-pressure chamber where the super-heated water flashes into steam. The steam is used to drive a turbine generator.
  • For low-temperature resources, binary cycle systems are used. Moderate temperature geothermal fluid is passed through a heat exchanger, where the heat is transferred to a fluid such as iso-butane which vaporizes. The vaporized fluid then drives a turbine generator.
Binary Cycle Geothermal Plant - From Geothermal Energy Association

Binary Cycle Geothermal Plant – From Geothermal Energy Association

An alternative to these traditional geothermal plants is the concept of hot rocks.

Hot rocks have been touted as a revolutionary method for generating electricity.

Hot rocks recently became newsworthy again when Khosla Ventures invested in AltaRock Energy, a company attempting to develop hot rocks.

The industry refers to hot rocks as enhanced geothermal systems (EGS).

The media has picked up on the fact that hot rocks requires the fracturing of rocks several thousand feet below the surface to allow water to flow into the high-temperature rock formations. The media likens this to fracking, though the industry likes to refer to this practice as hydro-shearing.

An MIT report in 2006 said that EGS could produce most, if not all of the electricity needs of the United States.

This was used by radical environmentalists, such as Greenpeace in its R[e]volition report, to make similar claims.

Basic description of hot rocks:

Hot rocks entails drilling two wells to depths reaching 8,000 feet or more, where there are high-temperature rock formations. Fracturing techniques are used to open fractures in the rocks between the two wells. Water is injected down one well where it is converted to steam as it travels through the fractures in the hot rocks. The steam rises to the surface through the second well and is used to drive a turbine generator.

While Khosla’s investment has garnered media attention in hot rocks, hot rocks is nothing new.

Geodynamics Limited in Australia has attempted to develop such installations since before 2003, and have drilled wells to depths of 14,500 feet. Subsequently, the wells have been abandoned, with various excuses given for the failure of the projects to produce electricity on a sustained basis.

It should be noted that an attempt at hot rock development in Basle, Switzerland in 2006 was halted when the “hydro-shearing” produced earthquakes exceeding 3 on the Richter scale.

The Department of Energy has reportedly thrown over $100 million into the development of hot rocks, with every indication that this taxpayer money will have been wasted. According to a 2005 report by Reuters, the Australian government also proposed spending A$500 million on hot rock development.

Hot rocks is like any other fantasy that’s based on some theoretical premise. The best scams always have a thread of truth around which to wrap the story used to lure the naive.

Like other fantasies, hot rocks is likely to be trumped by reality, and taxpayer subsidies will go the way of Solyndra’s.

 

* * * * * *

NOTE:

It’s easy to subscribe to articles by Donn Dears.

Go to the photo on the right side of the article where it says email subscription. Click and enter your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time.

If you know people who would be interested in these articles please send them a link to the article and suggest they also subscribe.

© Power For USA, 2010 – 2015. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author, Donn Dears LLC, is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Power For USA with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Advertisements
6 Comments leave one →
  1. robbradley58@gmail.com permalink
    October 20, 2015 1:12 pm

    This is nice and suitable for Master Resource if we can add the key links.

    We have not published much of all on ‘hot rocks’ aka geothermal …. – Rob

    Sent from my iPhone

    >

  2. Bryan Leyland permalink
    October 20, 2015 9:25 pm

    Excellent and accurate. A friend of mine worked for geodynamics.

    I a m in Afghanistan.

    Regards, Bryan Leyland Phone 021 978 996

    >

  3. October 23, 2015 4:28 pm

    A long time ago, in a galaxy far away, I was an EPRI project manager in the geothermal group of the renewable division.

    Because of my background in mineral chemistry, I was one of the people that made recommendations about whether EPRI should add money to the Los Alamos Hot Dry Rock project. I recommended against joining the project, because there were too many problems with the interactions of the water and the rock. Either the water escaped from the fracked area, or metastable silicates plugged up the fracked cracks. Those silicates tended to behave in an annoyingly random fashion. A hard problem to solve.

    EPRI didn’t have the money (unlike the government) to participate in a project with so many problems. Unlike regular oil and gas fracking, which is in relatively low-temperature sedimentary rocks, you are adding water to high-temp volcanic-based rocks in these projects. The chemistry is quite different.

    EPRI did invest in the binary-cycle geothermal plant at Heber, CA. We started it, as I recall. That was a very successful project. EPRI was quite willing to explore new technologies, if we felt they had a fighting chance of working.

    • October 23, 2015 5:21 pm

      Great comments. Many thanks. I appreciate the additional technical information.

Trackbacks

  1. Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup #202 | Watts Up With That?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s