Key, Electric Vehicle Headlines
There are three key headlines for US electric vehicle sales after the first six months of 2016:
- BEV (battery powered vehicles) sales have stalled.
- PHEV (plug-in vehicle) sales are up dramatically.
- HEV (hybrid) sales are down dramatically.
US Sales of Electric Vehicles, Including HEVs 2016 |
|||||
Month |
Hybrid (HEVs) |
PHEVs* |
Battery (BEVs) |
Totals |
Total PHEV & EV |
January |
20,967 |
3,137 |
3,576 |
27,680 |
6,713 |
February |
24,371 |
3,909 |
4,424 |
32,704 |
8,333 |
March |
28,756 |
5,290 |
7,115 |
41,161 |
12,405 |
Total 1Q |
74,094 |
12,336 |
15,115 |
101,545 |
27,451 |
Total 1Q 2015 |
86,005 |
7,722 |
14,127 |
107,854 |
21,849 |
% 1Q change |
-16% |
37% |
7% |
-6% |
20% |
April |
28,988 |
5,842 |
6,266 |
41,096 |
12,108 |
May |
30,573 |
5,619 |
6,526 |
42,718 |
12,145 |
June |
27,679 |
6,094 |
7,678 |
41,451 |
13,772 |
Total 2Q 2016 |
87,240 |
17,555 |
20,470 |
125,265 |
38,025 |
Total 2Q 2015 |
104,965 |
10,787 |
20,069 |
135,821 |
30,856 |
% 2Q change |
-17% |
63% |
2% |
-8% |
23% |
*Extended Range Vehicles
(Data from Electric Drive Transportation Association)
Introduction:
BEVs are vehicles powered entirely by battery power. PHEVs use the battery to travel for the first 35 miles, but then switch to an internal combustion engine to extend its range.
An important distinction between HEVs, such as the Prius, and BEVs or PHEVs is that an HEV can travel on battery power for an extremely short distance, if at all, while BEVs and PHEVs can travel for at least 35 miles using batteries alone.
HEVs are essentially battery-assisted vehicles that use the internal combustion engine to power the car.
Perhaps the most significant observation after the first six months of 2016, is that the sale of battery-powered vehicles (BEVs) has stalled.
This, in spite of the hype that Tesla received when it announced its new Model 3, priced at $35,000, with a 215 mile range.
It’s possible that drivers are beginning to see the PHEV as a better value than a BEV, since PHEVs have a range comparable to ordinary internal combustion engine vehicles of approximately 400 miles.
This may also account for the substantial increase in PHEV sales.
Meanwhile, sales of the HEV, similar to the original Prius, have fallen dramatically.
The price premium of HEVs is difficult to offset when gasoline prices are as low as they have been this year.
Norway, where 50,000 BEVs have been sold, provided generous subsidies for electric vehicles, so generous it was almost foolish to not purchase a BEV, has decided to roll back the subsidies. This could seriously crimp Tesla’s sales in Europe where Tesla has outperformed German luxury car makers.
Meanwhile China has been a disappointment for Tesla.
Tesla has been the most important seller of BEVs in the United States, with the LEAF and other manufacturers BEVs accounting for only a small part of BEV sales during the first six months of 2016.
Any slowdown in European sales by Tesla could be significant if BEV sales in the United States have stalled.
In addition, when Tesla sells more than 200,000 vehicles in the United States, Tesla vehicles will no longer be eligible for the $7,500 tax credit, which is likely to affect Tesla’s sales.
The media is, of course, still hyping BEVs, but the next six months could be a negative turning point for Tesla if sales of BEVs remain sluggish.
* * * * * *
Nothing to Fear explains why CO2 isn’t to be feared. Chapter 15, An Alternative
Hypothesis, describes Dr. Svensmark’s hypothesis on cosmic rays.
Nothing to Fear is available from Amazon and some independent book sellers.
Link to Amazon: http://amzn.to/1miBhXy
* * * * * *
NOTE:
It’s easy to subscribe to articles by Donn Dears.
Go to the photo on the right side of the article where it says email subscription. Click and enter your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time.
If you know people who would be interested in these articles please send them a link to the article and suggest they also subscribe.
© Power For USA, 2010 – 2016. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author, Donn Dears LLC, is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Power For USA with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Donn,
I just received this infographic on Tesla’s opening of its gigafactory and the slides are on the sunny side of the street. Thoughts?
http://www.mining.com/web/infographic-teslas-gigafactory-opens-this-week-what-we-know-in-9-epic-slides/?utm_source=digest-en-mining-160727&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=digest
Thanks. I hadn’t seen this infographic before.
It’s obviously ambitious. But can the objectives be achieved?
Key objective is cutting costs 30%, but there is little accompanying data to suggest the target can be achieved.
For example: Reduction in waste. How much waste is there now, when the batteries are being made by others.
Economies of scale: Sounds good, but what are the economies?Assembling a battery pack requires specific operations. Can they be improved? If he has the identical machines or work stations repeating the same operations, and merely has multiple workstations, where are the savings?
Vertical integration savings, imply savings between operations where all operations are done under the same roof rather than separate roofs. But he has been buying batteries, so this implies that his suppliers are inefficient in this respect.
Optimizing processes also implies that his suppliers are inefficient.
Maybe so, maybe not.
Time will tell.
Actually, his new vision of building busses, 18 wheeler trucks, and pick-up trucks, and PV roof tops sounds like desperation to keep the stock price high.
Again, we’ll see.
So far he hasn’t delivered on his promises.
Thanks Donn.
Here is another recent article that attempts to show how costs will be cut (automation?).
http://www.industryweek.com/companies-executives/musk-preps-tesla-its-next-steps?NL=IW-07&sfvc4enews=42&cl=article_6_b&utm_rid=CPG03000001427928&utm_campaign=13547&utm_medium=email&elq2=8d3e70a32cc94b63b2c24b9709fee39f
I still wonder about the supply chain of raw materials. Lithium is not sold on the commodities market and the three major producers (all in South America) are privately owned. Supply and demand will certainly come into play. Part of the cost saving for battery production will come from replacing synthetic carbon with natural carbon products but this is not a really large mining business. Natural carbon comes from quite variable deposits. It always amazes me (trained as a geologist) how some very smart people don’t realize the complexity of mined materials. I think the really interesting part of this factory experiment is the energy sources to power it. Tesla caped the natural gas lines to the plant and will rely almost completely on solar (no diesel backup generators). Instead, wind and geothermal will be the “backup.”
An update on the Tesla-SolarCity merger-
http://www.industryweek.com/energy/tesla-cut-solarcity-bid-gets-cool-reception-investors?NL=IW-07&sfvc4enews=42&cl=article_6_b&utm_rid=CPG03000001427928&utm_campaign=13687&utm_medium=email&elq2=43fe048c4d9f43e0a2bb2d9a49664578
Looks like it was not a slam dunk.
Lois: Thanks for the new information.
I agree with your summary. Your comment on the graphite issue is very interesting. Will natural flaws in the carbon create problems?
I agree that the reliance on solar is very interesting. It’s also not very smart. I don’t know the load, so can’t evaluate whether the added cost will have a significant effect on battery pack cost. I also don’t know whether he is getting a 30% subsidy for the cost of installing the solar panels. If so, which I think he is getting, this lowers his cost … again at tax payer expense.
Carbon deposits are always interesting. I had the opportunity to work with a New Jersey company called Asbury Carbon several years back and their brochure shows the variety of carbon products they sell, including flake graphite (natural graphite). I am not sure if there are any flaws in the product but I wonder about the amount of supply that is out there.
Click to access Brochure.pdf
Here is another carbon company that is interesting to watch for graphite exploration and mining since they are also combining pegmatite deposits for lithium sources.
http://www.saintjeancarbon.com/index.php/news/2016-press-releases1/
For amusements, here is an article on graphite production in the early days in NJ.
Click to access graphite.pdf
According to this article, it looks like our Green Energy batteries, which employ graphite, are really (chuckle) fossil fuel products. I wonder if there will be carbon taxing of this material?
As for the solar energy source for the Gigafactory, Elon Musk appears to be really good at cobbling together tax credits since he has merged his solar business with the battery business.
Thanks. Great information.
Update-
Sort of related – Musk’s Nevada ventures (solar)
State Supreme Court Unanimously Spikes Elon Musk’s Solar Plans
http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/05/state-supreme-court-unamiously-spikes-elon-musks-solar-plans/
Buffett and Musk in the ring
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/05/state-supreme-court-unamiously-spikes-elon-musks-solar-plans/#ixzz4GYCSHFkP
It will save Nevada taxpayers a lot of money.